NULS Community Incentive Proposal
Purpose - Why ?
Great things are being witnessed as more and more projects starts deploying DApps on NULS ecosystem. However, consider the long-term well-being of NULS and its community, we must face the fact that the liquidity of NULS on market is getting worse, along with some other challenges coming in this unpredictable market circumstance.
That’s why I, as a loyal community supporter, am here to present the proposal. This proposal will take effective measures to increase NULS liquidity, thus creating a better feedback to the community. I will be explaining how this goals can be achieved by applying ideas brought up in this proposal and I sincerely asking every NULS community support to join the NULS ecosystem construction.
Measures to be taken - How?
- Creating new nodes, the incentives from the nodes will awarded to the NULS ecosystem builders.
- Nodes incentives will be used for NerveSwap Farm output.
|Nodes/Server maintenance fees
||Present in the monthly report
The amount of community fund requesting details is as below:
|Deposit amount requested
|Staking support requested
- Nodes maintenance.
- Nodes incentive distribution.
- Create Farming pools on NerveFarm / NerveFarm maintenance.
- Submit detailed expenses to the community monthly.
This proposal is completely misplaced!!
Why the hell are you proposing to use NULS nodes for incentives and liquidity increases in the Nerve project?
If Nerve wants to increase liquidity, use nerve nodes to encourage it. If there is any proposal that involves NULS nodes, it will be to encourage the development of projects within NULS, not Nerve!!! If it were still to encourage liquidity or create liquidity pools at Nulswap, it would make a lot more sense, but it seems that the team or friends of the team want to play around with projects between nabox and nerve with NULS rewards.
To top it off, where can I see recent feature development on the NULS network? It’s just that it seems to me that they abandoned the boat and I only see shit projects joining the POCM.
As an important project in the NULS ecosystem, the core members of NULS are very supportive, which is conducive to the development of NULS. We also provided a lot of development advice and support for Nuslwap. We also think it would be a good plan to implement a similar proposal on Nuslwap.
If we don’t develop NULS, we can no longer do many things, and all these things mean that we hope NULS develops better.
I don’t think anyone holds more NULS than our council members.